Baseline Study of Home Energy Retrofit Programs

by Shana Fong on January 24, 2011

The National Home Performance Council has published a new report profiling the current state of whole-house energy retrofit programs in the United States. The study, which is based on a review of 126 programs nationwide, provides a broad snapshot of how government policies have impacted state- and utility-based energy efficiency retrofit programs in recent years.

The study found that the vast majority of programs (90%) are sponsored by municipal or investor-owned or utilities, with most (86%) providing some kind of incentive or rebate to homeowners. Just over half of the programs (52%) offer homeowners free energy audits, most requiring program-specific or BPI certification for auditors. Only 18% of the programs use the auditor-contractor model in which audits are performed by the same contractor who will do the work. Most of the remaining programs (75% of the total) require auditing to be performed by a third party.

“This is a time of tremendous change and growth for the energy efficiency retrofit industry,” NHPC Managing Director Robin LeBaron said in reference to the report. “In five years, the field will look very different than it does now. This study provides a baseline for us to study how the field evolves.” The organization announced that it plans to issue a follow‐up study in 2011.

Download the full NHPC report in PDF format here: Residential Energy Efficiency Retrofit Programs in the U.S.

Source: Efficiency First

The Most Powerful Contractor Marketing Weapon

by Shana Fong on January 21, 2011
TAGGED WITH 

(Hint: You Already Own It)

Source: ACCA

An old saying states that people don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care. Don’t let your familiarity with the saying make you numb to its far-reaching business power.

Like many of you, we’ve been involved in numerous contracting projects over the years. We’ve built a home, renovated six buildings, and hired for all sorts of projects from retiling to roofs to remodeling a kitchen. We’ve had some go wrong, such as the sheetrock job that looked like a drunken rhinoceros careened off every wall. We also had a tile setter mix boxes of tile mid-job, creating a really nice two-tone effect that he defended as stylish. Thankfully, these miscues are in the minority.

The majority of the contractors have been exceptional. Yet there’s one trait among even the good ones that causes their rehire rate to be barely higher than that of the rotten ones. This mistake totally short circuits future calls and referrals, and it’s costing you a fortune, even though the power to correct it exists in your company, right now, today.

The mistake is ignoring the relationship.

See, a bad contractor (whether he knows he’s bad or not) doesn’t get a callback or referrals due to poor work. And a good contractor most often doesn’t get a callback or referrals because of inattention to his customers. Same result, for entirely different reasons.

Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind
Think of your past friends and relationships. The most common reason they’re in the past and not the present is you fell out of touch. You might have even been a good friend with much in common, yet if not in touch, you’re not on the friend list. There are even figures to back this up. According to a Good Housekeeping survey of those who purchased from contractors:

  • Thirty-seven percent said the relationship was the most important reason.
  • Twenty-two percent said it was because you stayed in touch after a previous purchase.
  • Fourteen percent were referred by a friend or family member.

Add those up, and 73 percent of your sales have some relationship tie-in.

Unfortunately, most contractors just service them, bill them, and hope for the best.

So, how do you rank in terms of customer relations and retention?

With minimum retention efforts, you get a call, and it’s answered by the nearest minimally trained receptionist. You schedule, show up, do the work, present the invoice, then go home. No follow-up is attempted. You assume, “If they need me, they know how to reach me.” Unless you live in a town with exactly one contractor, good luck.

With average retention efforts, your call handling quality is dependent upon who answers. You deliver what you consider fair — no more, no less. Techs are intermittently trained. Some customers get an agreement offer, some don’t. Your CSR may make a call-behind or send a thank you note, but this is not systemized. Newsletters and follow-up range from spotty to nonexistent. You dabble with improvement but with little lasting change. Customers feel the inconsistency and migrate away. Repeat calls and referrals suffer miserably.

With maximum retention efforts, you categorize poorly trained employees as unethical business. You answer the phones consistently and make consistent high-quality presentations. Follow-up is automatic, starting with happy calls and a thank you card that contains a referral request. Seasonal newsletters go out like clockwork. Your website, value-building ads, forms, and leave-behinds are not purely sales pieces (though they boost prices and closing ratios) but educational customer-awareness tools. Customers get outbound messages from you — online and offline — eight to 14 times per year.

If you’re in the maximum category, congratulations. You also probably dominate your market and not by coincidence. Yet for the others, don’t make this too hard. Start simply with two things:

  1. The thank you note and call. Even the most basic thank you note (automatically generated and about 45 cents worth of effort) tells customers they’re valuable. It’s so easy to do and so easy not to do. Most choose the latter.
  2. A newsletter. Since thank you notes are transaction based (and thus sporadic or potentially forgotten between visits), you must have at least one calendar-based item. A quality newsletter sent out two to four times a year will position your company branding as different from perhaps 90 percent of the other contractors in town. That’s an incredible advantage for not much money.

Start where you can. Your customers, company, and profits deserve the boost.

The Cost of Electric Power Resources

by Shana Fong on January 18, 2011

Levelized costs for each energy technology option are mostly in ranges that overlap. Costs will vary with individual projects, but it is important to note that technology advancements have closed the price gap between renewable energy and conventional power. Nuclear and solar PV are currently the most costly energy resources to develop, though recent forecasts suggest solar costs will continue to decline in coming years with the addition of new manufacturing capacity.

Source: Earth Trends Delivered

HUD PowerSaver Pilot Loan Program

by Shana Fong on January 14, 2011
TAGGED WITH 

The Lawrence Berkley National Lab (LBNL) has just released a financing Policy brief on the creation of a pilot loan program for home energy improvements put together by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), planned for introduction in early 2011.The PowerSaver loan program is a new, energy-focused variant of the Title I Property Improvement Loan Insurance Program (Title I Program). The PowerSaver pilot will provide lender insurance for secured and unsecured loans up to $25,000 to single family homeowners. These loans will specifically target residential energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements. HUD estimates the two-year pilot will fund approximately 24,000 loans worth up to $300 million; the program is not capped. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA), HUD’s mortgage insurance unit, will provide up to $25 million in grants as incentives to participating lenders. FHA is seeking lenders in communities with existing programs for promoting residential energy upgrades.

More info on the program is available through HUD: FHA PowerSaver

Recurve Software Approved for Northern Virginia Home Performance with ENERGY STAR Pilot

by Shana Fong on January 11, 2011
TAGGED WITH 

Recurve Software has been approved for use in North Virginia’s Home Performance with ENERGY STAR pilot program. This program represents a new approach by the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency to work directly with home performance contractors, cutting down on program implementation and administrative costs.

For more information on the NoVa Home Performance with ENERGY STAR program, check out their website.

Important Updates to Federal Tax Credits for Energy Efficient Upgrades

by Shana Fong on January 10, 2011
TAGGED WITH 

The tax credits known as 25C are extended through 2011, but at a significantly reduced value and with changes made to some of the qualifying equipment standards. The new tax credits begin on January 1, 2011 and last through December 31, 2011. The main difference is an eligible homeowner can claim 10% of the costs for the installation of qualified energy efficient improvements, capped at $500.

Under the new law the max a homeowner could claim on equipment is:

  • $300 for a qualified central air conditioner and heat pump (HVAC and hot water equipments)
  • $150 for a qualified furnace or hot water boiler
  • $50 for any advanced main air circulating fan.
  • $300 for Qualified hot water heaters

The new law will also increase the qualifying standards for hot water boilers, including natural gas, propane, oil furnaces, and oil boilers to 95% AFUE. The qualifying standards for natural gas furnaces and propane furnace remain at 95% AFUE.

The qualifying standard for central air conditioners and heat pumps, which were modified by the Stimulus bill in 2009, are not changed.

The major difference is the new law reinstates the lifetime credit caps of 2005. This means any homeowner who has claimed more than $500 in 25C tax credits since January 1, 2005, is disqualified from any further credits.

Another major question is whether someone can still get the $1,500 tax credit who signs a contract for work before Dec 31,2010 even if the actual work isn’t done until 2011. The work must be completed by December 31, 2010 in order to qualify for the $1,500 cap. If the qualifying improvements are completed before January 1, 2011, then you may still claim the $1,500 cap.

To read the Tax Provision of 2009 ending Dec 31, 2010, click here to be redirected to the IRS page.

To read the Original Tax Provision of 2005, click here to be redirected to the IRS page.

“This information is provided to you as a courtesy by Recurve and should not be considered tax or accounting advice. You are urged to consult an accountant or tax attorney if you wish to have certainty about your tax claims.”

The Importance of Home Energy Use

by Shana Fong on

A great snapshot of why it’s important that we curb our energy use – starting at home – by Lawrence Berkeley Lab:

$241 billion. That’s how much consumers spend each year on energy for home use. About 1 in 5 of the nation’s energy dollars is spent in homes. Energy efficiency improvements could cut this number by well over half.

90% of your time. That’s the proportion of the average American’s time spent indoors. The quality of indoor air is often worse than the air outside. Moisture and gasses from building materials are some of the many invisible sources of indoor air pollution. When done right, energy efficiency upgrades will also improve indoor air quality and make your home safer and more comfortable.

1.2 billion tons of greenhouse-gas emissions. That’s what is emitted (as carbon dioxide) into the atmosphere as a byproduct of making the energy to power U.S. homes. Every single thing done to save energy at home trims these emissions.

Did you know that the typical U.S. family spends about $1,900 a year on home utility bills? Unfortunately, a large portion of that energy is wasted. And each year, electricity generated by fossil fuels for a single home puts more carbon dioxide into the air than two average cars.

Right in your own home, you have the power to reduce energy demand, and when you reduce demand, you cut the amount of resources, like coal and gas, needed to make energy—that means you create less greenhouse gas emissions, which keeps air cleaner for all of us…and saves on your utility bills! Plus, reducing energy use increases our energy security.

VP Biden Announces Home Energy Score Program

by Shana Fong on November 12, 2010

With the new Home Energy Score, consumers will find out how their home compares with others and how much money they could save by adding insulation, sealing air leaks or doing other upgrades. Ten U.S. communities will test the score, similar to a miles-per-gallon label for cars, before it’s rolled out nationally next summer.

“Together, these programs will grow the home retrofit industry and help middle-class families save money and energy,” says Vice President Biden

The program is designed to encourage homeowners to make energy-saving upgrades and to jump-start the industry for home energy retrofits, Biden said in a statement. It will also include financing for homeowners (up to $25,000) and software that will let energy contractors give consumers the home efficiency equivalent of miles per gallon for cars.

Sources:
CNET
USA Today

Recurve Named to Prestigious Inc 5000

by Shana Fong on September 21, 2010

The results are in: we are honored to be named to the Inc. 5000 list, ranking #24 in Top Energy Companies, #39 in San Francisco, and #682 overall.

The Inc. 5000 list was based on revenue growth from 2006 to 2009 and had to meet certain qualifications, such as being privately held and for-profit.

Perhaps as a harbinger of things to come, Inc. Magazine remarks about their list:

More encouraging are the companies sprouting in industries such as health (32, compared with 15 in 2000), energy (16, compared with three in 2000), and education (six, compared with one in 2000). These sectors represent teeth-grindingly tough issues, on which entrepreneurial zeal and fresh thinking are sorely needed.

Americans Don’t Know Jack About Saving Energy

by Shana Fong on August 19, 2010

In this illuminating post by Grist, we learn through a recent survey by The Earth Institute at Columbia University that Americans really don’t know jack about saving energy.

The largest group, nearly 20 percent, cited turning off lights as the best approach—an action that affects energy budgets relatively little. Very few cited buying decisions that experts say would cut U.S. energy consumption dramatically, such as more efficient cars (cited by only 2.8 percent), more efficient appliances (cited by 3.2 percent) or weatherizing homes (cited by 2.1 percent).

About 2.8 percent of those responding said they could save energy by sleeping or relaxing more, compared with 2.1 percent who said they could do so by insulating their homes (can you guess which is actually more effective?).

Jonathan Hiskes of Grist asserts:

The theme of the confusion was that participants tended to name steps that involved doing less or using less of things — turning off lights, turning down thermostats — rather than solutions that allow them to get the same amount of light and heat through less energy (via insulation and LED bulbs). That gets at a key difference between conservation and efficiency. The first means using less; the second means getting the same results through more intelligent use of resources. Both have a place, but it’s a problem if people understand all of efficiency as “sacrifice.” A home retrofit that cuts $500 off your heating bills for the year isn’t a sacrifice — it’s a financial and environmental win.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »